Difference between revisions of ".MTE1MQ.NTU2MA"

From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
But from the Evidence in the Case it appears that Capt. Pendletons Conduct in Some Instances arose from a Mistaken Zeal to Serve the publick [public] and in Others from an erroneous Judgement they therefore acquit Capt. Pendleton of Defauding the United States in either Case; though they think his Conduct very reprehensible: It appears to the Court that on the Latter part of the 2d Charge that Capt. Pendleton has not kept the Bounties: that he has kept part of the Wages drawn in the names of Barns[?] and Hooker[?] for his own use but by their Consent[?], But he is not
+
But from the Evidence in the Case it appears that Capt. Pendletons Conduct in Some Instances arose from a Mistaken Zeal to Serve the publick [public] and in Others from an erroneous Judgement they therefore acquit Capt. Pendleton of Defauding the United States in either Case; though they think his Conduct very reprehensible: It appears to the Court that on the Latter part of the 2d Charge that Capt. Pendleton has not kept the Bounties: that he has kept part of the Wages drawn in the names of Barns and Hooker for his own use but by their Consent, But he is not

Revision as of 17:28, 2 September 2020

But from the Evidence in the Case it appears that Capt. Pendletons Conduct in Some Instances arose from a Mistaken Zeal to Serve the publick [public] and in Others from an erroneous Judgement they therefore acquit Capt. Pendleton of Defauding the United States in either Case; though they think his Conduct very reprehensible: It appears to the Court that on the Latter part of the 2d Charge that Capt. Pendleton has not kept the Bounties: that he has kept part of the Wages drawn in the names of Barns and Hooker for his own use but by their Consent, But he is not