Difference between revisions of ".MTczOA.MjAxNDc"
From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The committee to whom was referred the Preamble & Order moved yesterday by Mr Smith of Nobleboro' requesting the opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court &c, reported that the same be indefinitely postponed - | The committee to whom was referred the Preamble & Order moved yesterday by Mr Smith of Nobleboro' requesting the opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court &c, reported that the same be indefinitely postponed - | ||
| − | Before the question of acceptance was taken Mr Ruggles of Thomaston moved an amendment of the Order referred to said Committee as follows, " Fourth, can the members of the House and the members of the Senate, in convention, constitutionally designate who are the constitutional candidates to supply such deficiencies from the | + | Before the question of acceptance was taken Mr Ruggles of Thomaston moved an amendment of the Order referred to said Committee as follows, " Fourth, can the members of the House and the members of the Senate, in convention, constitutionally designate who are the constitutional candidates to supply such deficiencies from the ordnance |
Revision as of 12:30, 3 September 2020
49
Tuesday February 2nd 1830
met according to adjournment.
The committee to whom was referred the Preamble & Order moved yesterday by Mr Smith of Nobleboro' requesting the opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court &c, reported that the same be indefinitely postponed - Before the question of acceptance was taken Mr Ruggles of Thomaston moved an amendment of the Order referred to said Committee as follows, " Fourth, can the members of the House and the members of the Senate, in convention, constitutionally designate who are the constitutional candidates to supply such deficiencies from the ordnance