Difference between revisions of ".MTc4Mw.MjEzMDI"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
221 | 221 | ||
| − | Saturday March 5 | + | |
| + | Saturday March 5. 1831 | ||
| + | |||
Met according to adjournment | Met according to adjournment | ||
| − | Mr. Shapleigh of Berwick moved to take up the consideration of the following Order offered by Mr. | + | Mr. Shapleigh of Berwick moved to take up the consideration of the following Order offered by Mr. Boutelle of Waterville on the 25th of Feby. last - to wit. - "Ordered that - be a committee of this House to inquire into the expediency of asking the opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court as to the Construction of the 2d. and 3d. sections of Article 4th. part first in the Constitution so far as it regards the number of Representatives required to be apportioned" and the question upon now taking up this Order was on motion taken by Yeas and Nays as follows - Yeas 84. Nays 29. |
| − | Mr. Knowlton of Montville then moved that the further consideration of said Order be postponed indefinitely and this question was on motion of Mr. Bourne of Kennebunk taken by | + | |
| + | Mr. Knowlton of Montville then moved that the further consideration of said Order be postponed indefinitely and this question was on motion of Mr. Bourne of Kennebunk taken by Yeas and Nays and was decided as follows - Yeas 71. Nays 56. | ||
| + | |||
| + | (for yeas & nays see pages 464. 466) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Resolve in favor of William King was read and recommitted to the Committee who reported the same. | ||
| − | + | The Committee on Engrossed Bills report as duly engrossed - | |
| + | Bill - to establish the Reed Ferry Company which was passed to be enacted - sent up for concurrence. | ||
| − | The | + | The following communication from the Speaker was then read by the Clerk - |
| − | + | To the Honorable the House of Representatives - | |
| − | + | Having been appointed to a situation in the Judicial department, incompatible with the Station I have the honor to hold in the House - I hereby resign the the Honorable trust committed to me by | |
| − | Having been appointed to a situation in the Judicial department incompatible with the Station I have the honor to hold in the House - I hereby resign the the Honorable trust committed to me by | ||
Revision as of 16:47, 19 February 2021
221
Saturday March 5. 1831
Met according to adjournment
Mr. Shapleigh of Berwick moved to take up the consideration of the following Order offered by Mr. Boutelle of Waterville on the 25th of Feby. last - to wit. - "Ordered that - be a committee of this House to inquire into the expediency of asking the opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court as to the Construction of the 2d. and 3d. sections of Article 4th. part first in the Constitution so far as it regards the number of Representatives required to be apportioned" and the question upon now taking up this Order was on motion taken by Yeas and Nays as follows - Yeas 84. Nays 29.
Mr. Knowlton of Montville then moved that the further consideration of said Order be postponed indefinitely and this question was on motion of Mr. Bourne of Kennebunk taken by Yeas and Nays and was decided as follows - Yeas 71. Nays 56.
(for yeas & nays see pages 464. 466)
Resolve in favor of William King was read and recommitted to the Committee who reported the same.
The Committee on Engrossed Bills report as duly engrossed - Bill - to establish the Reed Ferry Company which was passed to be enacted - sent up for concurrence.
The following communication from the Speaker was then read by the Clerk -
To the Honorable the House of Representatives - Having been appointed to a situation in the Judicial department, incompatible with the Station I have the honor to hold in the House - I hereby resign the the Honorable trust committed to me by