Difference between revisions of ".MjEwNQ.MjgyOTM"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Yeas. Messrs. Bensen, Jarvis, Merrow, Severance, Spear and Weeks ______ 6. | Yeas. Messrs. Bensen, Jarvis, Merrow, Severance, Spear and Weeks ______ 6. | ||
Nays. Messrs. Allen, Clark, Fish, Frye, Greene, Jewett, Johnson, Kelsey, Latham, Mantor, Miller, Pierce, Purrington, Strickland, Swift and Talbot 16. | Nays. Messrs. Allen, Clark, Fish, Frye, Greene, Jewett, Johnson, Kelsey, Latham, Mantor, Miller, Pierce, Purrington, Strickland, Swift and Talbot 16. | ||
| + | Sent down for concurrence. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Bill to incorporate the Lime Burners' Bank was read the second time ... and the question of passing the same to be engrossed was decided in the negative (passage refused) as follows, to wit: | ||
| + | Yeas. Messrs. Jarvis, Mantor, Merrow, Severance and Spear ______ 5. | ||
| + | Nays. Messrs. Allen. Clark, Fish, Frye, Greene, Jewett, Johnson, Kelsey, Latham, McIntire, Miller, Pierce, Strickland, Swift, Talbot and Weeks ___ 16. | ||
Sent down for concurrence. | Sent down for concurrence. | ||
Revision as of 12:17, 5 August 2021
414
second time --- And the question of passing the same to be engrossed was decided in the negative (passage refused) as follows, to wit: Yeas. Messrs. Bensen, Jarvis, Merrow, Severance, Spear and Weeks ______ 6. Nays. Messrs. Allen, Clark, Fish, Frye, Greene, Jewett, Johnson, Kelsey, Latham, Mantor, Miller, Pierce, Purrington, Strickland, Swift and Talbot 16. Sent down for concurrence.
Bill to incorporate the Lime Burners' Bank was read the second time ... and the question of passing the same to be engrossed was decided in the negative (passage refused) as follows, to wit: Yeas. Messrs. Jarvis, Mantor, Merrow, Severance and Spear ______ 5. Nays. Messrs. Allen. Clark, Fish, Frye, Greene, Jewett, Johnson, Kelsey, Latham, McIntire, Miller, Pierce, Strickland, Swift, Talbot and Weeks ___ 16. Sent down for concurrence.