Livingstonbennett0271

From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Revision as of 05:06, 9 June 2024 by Livingstonbennett0271 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Top Personal Injury Law Firms<br /><br />Being injured as a result of negligence of another's can be very distressing. Aside from severe physical pain, it could also be financ...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Top Personal Injury Law Firms

Being injured as a result of negligence of another's can be very distressing. Aside from severe physical pain, it could also be financially burdensome. The costs could include high medical bills as well as loss of household income.

Personal injury lawyers can assist with these financial difficulties. Their websites should clearly communicate potential clients why they're the best choice in their situation. Credibility is built by trust badges, awards, and client reviews.

Barasch McGarry Salzman & Penson

Michael Barasch graduated in 1980 from Fordham University School of Law. He worked for two famous personal injury firms for 14 years, trying scores of cases on behalf of injured victims of accidents. He experienced the joy of winning cases, and the gratitude expressed by his clients. personal injury lawyer attorney decided to partner with Jim McGarry and establish the law firm of Barasch & McGarry.

This New York City law firm concentrates on personal injury cases, wrongful deaths, and medical malpractice. They represent clients throughout New York City, the surrounding areas including the Bronx and Queens as well as Long Island, the Bronx and Long Island. They are dedicated to representing clients with the highest standards of ethical conduct and professionalism.





One of their clients is Yvonne, who was teaching in Manhattan when the World Trade Center was hit by two planes on the 11th of September. She was assured that the air was safe and returned to work three weeks after. She now suffers from cancer that is linked to the 9/11 attacks.

Another client is Ken, who was working for Goldman Sachs at the time of the attacks. Ken was suffering from respiratory issues and was diagnosed with kidney cell carcinoma linked to 9/11, which is a type of cancer that develops when asbestos and other toxic substances are inhaled. Yvonne and Ken sought assistance from attorneys of this law firm.

Sakkas, Cahn & Weiss

Matthew Sakkas started his career as a lawyer in an insurance defense firm which specialized in cases that involved construction and premises accidents. After several years he joined the plaintiff's firm and has been in charge of handling personal injury cases from intake to trial as well as writing and contesting appeals.

Adam Cahn began his practice in 1994, focusing on a wide range of litigation matters including medical malpractice, CRPS/RSD injury medical devices, brain injuries litigation, and construction accident cases. He has won numerous verdicts and settled cases across New York State. He also successfully argued in the Appellate Court, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, and federal courts.

BBB recommends businesses that adhere to certain standards of reliability and ethical business practices. These include a pledge to solve any consumer complaints and to adhere to applicable laws regulations, laws and rules. Businesses in this sector may also be required to maintain professional licensing, bonding or registration. Companies that have these qualifications are eligible to display the BBB "BBB Business Profile" seal. Learn more. BBB Business Profiles are developed and maintained by BBB.

Arye, Lustig & Sassower

Arye, Lustig & Sassower represents injured people and their families for more than 40 years. The firm handles a broad range of personal injury cases which include construction accidents as well as claims for wrongful death. The firm's partners are recognized for their expertise as they have been named to the New York Super Lawyers list and receiving Martindale-Hubbell's highest Av rating. They have also taught for the Practicing Law Institute and the New York City Bar Association in continuing legal education seminars on trial practice.

Founded in 1965, Arye Lustig was founded in the year 1965. The firm concentrates on personal injury cases, including cases involving workplace injuries as well as medical malpractice. The firm's lawyers are skilled in handling litigation both at the trial and appeals levels. They have recovered more than a billion dollars for their clients. The firm is led by senior trial lawyer D. Carl Lustig III and managing partner Mitchell J. Sassower. It is a member of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum as and the American Board of Trial Advocates. It is also a member of the New York State Trial Lawyers Association and the New York City Trial Lawyers Alliance.

Jaroslawicz & Jaros

In 2006, Jaroslawicz & Steinberg verbally agreed to purchase real estate in Romania during the peak of the real property boom. The first property they purchased was a huge success, and their investment more than doubled within five months. They were so ecstatic by their success that it inspired them to purchase more properties. They sourced the funds for these purchases through a variety of side deals with third parties. These side deals also included profit-sharing agreements that appeared to be incompatible with the original agreement between Steinberg and Jaroslawicz to split profits from business equally.

The Investor Plaintiffs allege that Steinberg invested capital in the venture through the sale of his apartment. The Court, however, finds that Steinberg's account is credible. He did not offer to sell his apartment to fund the venture. Steinberg and Jaroslawicz were acquaintances, who socialized sometimes with one another and with their respective spouses. They also were members of the same Orthodox synagogue, and lived in the same area.

Furthermore the Court credits Steinberg's testimony that he fought Vladarean for the stolen EUR345,330 through civil channels in Romania as well as by utilizing the collection agency. The Court therefore dismisses the Investor Plaintiffs' Counterclaim with prejudice.