.MjEwNg.Mjk5MDM

[page 535] them to be on duty, leave their rooms? A. I considered they were on duty then as long as they were in the hall. Q. So long as they were in their rooms? A. That is in the hall. Q. Then if I understand you, you considered that not a disobeyance of the rule? A. Yes, sir, according to that rule; but the rules over there are not carried out strictly. Q. I ask you if you considered it to be obediance to this rule when they were staying in those rooms unlocked, reading, during hours of duty. Dr. Butler: I object. Q. I wasnt to know whether, when you saw that rule violated by any attendant under your charge, you reproved him for it or ordered him to do otherwise? A. No. Q. Didn't? A. No, sir. Do you want me to give my reasons? Q. Were you familiar with Rule I under

"Supervisors": "The male and female superviosrs

will have the supervision of the employees of their respective ways, and will be held accountable for the faithful performance of their duties."