.MjEwNg.MzAzMTk

Ques. Wouldn't you call them gross perversions of facts in many instances? Ans. There are statements there which the editor or reporter, or any one here, if they heard the evidence given and fully understood it on the case, might be called gross perversions. But it might be true that the reporter or correspondent, or whoever put it in there might have misunderstood it. I would not charge perversion upon him Ques. I did not speak of that at all. I asked you as to its effect upon the public, morally? Ans. I dont know about that. They would not make any impression upon me and I dont think they would upon the committee. Ques. I presume that none of the facts stated in that article were communicated by you were they? Ans. No, sir, none of these facts you speak of. Ques. Do you know by whom they were communicated? Ans. No, sir. I never read all the article before it was published and haven't the slightest knowledge of its