Jokumsenmartinsen0609

Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening, severe, generalized, or systemic hypersensitivity reaction. The incidence of anaphylaxis is increasing especially in pediatric age. Our aim in this study was to investigate the knowledge and attitudes of the physicians on the diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis. METHODS A questionnaire form consisting of a total of 18 questions was prepared. Six questions concerned demographic data; 7 questions inquired about physician's knowledge level about treatment of anaphylaxis. In the last part, 5 different case scenarios were given, and their diagnoses and treatments were asked. RESULTS A total of 120 physicians participated in the study. Of the participants, 66.7% were residents. The rate of correct answer about dose of epinephrine was 57.5%. The rates of making correct diagnoses in anaphylaxis case scenarios 1, 2, and 3 were 60%, 73.3%, and 91.7%, respectively, whereas epinephrine administration rates were 54%, 67.5%, and 92.5%, respectively. When the answers of all these questions given by the residents and specialists and among physicians who updated and did not update were compared, there were no statistically significant differences except epinephrine administration rate and its route (P less then 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study suggest that physicians' knowledge levels were inadequate in making the diagnosis of anaphylaxis, and physicians use epinephrine in conditions without hypotension or an undefined possible/known allergen contact. Information about epinephrine administration was partially correct. It is currently considered to be the simplest measure to have a written anaphylaxis action plan including diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis.BACKGROUND Retropharyngeal and parapharyngeal abscesses (RPAs, PPAs) usually affect young children. Surgical drainage and/or antibiotic therapy are treatment of choice, but no specific guidelines exist. In order to reduce the risk of severe complications, appropriate diagnosis and therapy are necessary. The aims of the study were to review diagnosis and management of children with RPAs/PPAs and to compare surgical versus medical approach. METHODS This is a multicenter retrospective study including all patients younger than 15 years admitted at 4 Italian pediatric hospitals of Florence, Padua, Rome, and Treviso, with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision discharge diagnosis code of RPAs and PPAs, from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2016. RESULTS One hundred fifty-three children were included. The median age was 4.4 years, with overall male predominance. Heterogeneous signs and symptoms (fever, neck cervical, lymphadenopathy, pain, and stiff neck most frequently) and a large mixture of bactprove patients' outcomes.OBJECTIVES Personal protective equipment (PPE) is worn by health care providers (HCPs) to protect against hazardous exposures. Studies of HCPs performing critical resuscitation tasks in PPE have yielded mixed results and have not evaluated performance in care of children. We evaluated the impacts of PPE on timeliness or success of emergency procedures performed by pediatric HCPs. METHODS This prospective study was conducted at 2 tertiary children's hospitals. For session 1, HCPs (medical doctors and registered nurses) wore normal attire; for session 2, they wore full-shroud PPE garb with 2 glove types Ebola level or chemical. During each session, they performed clinical tasks on a patient simulator intubation, bag-valve mask ventilation, venous catheter (IV) placement, push-pull fluid bolus, and defibrillation. Differences in completion time per task were compared. RESULTS There were no significant differences in medical doctor completion time across sessions. For registered nurses, there was a significant difference between baseline and PPE sessions for both defibrillation and IV placement tasks. Registered nurses were faster to defibrillate in Ebola PPE and slower when wearing chemical PPE (median difference, -3.5 vs 2 seconds, respectively; P less then 0.01). Registered nurse IV placement took longer in Ebola and chemical PPE (5.5 vs 42 seconds, respectively; P less then 0.01). After the PPE session, participants were significantly less likely to indicate that full-body PPE interfered with procedures, was claustrophobic, or slowed them down. CONCLUSIONS Personal protective equipment did not affect procedure timeliness or success on a simulated child, with the exception of IV placement. Further study is needed to investigate PPE's impact on procedures performed in a clinical care context.STUDY OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine the impact of the ACEP (American College of Emergency Physicians) clinical policy regarding diagnosis of suspected appendicitis on changing practice in the pediatric emergency department (ED) in the absence of a formal departmental protocol. METHODS This was a retrospective chart review in a pediatric ED in which patients aged 2 to 18 years were evaluated for appendicitis via ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), or both, over a 7-year study period. We compared rates of CT utilization in the period before the release of the ACEP clinical policy regarding diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis (2008-2009) and the period after (2010-2014). D609 Other metrics of interest were ultrasound results and physician response to results, as well as surrogate markers for quality of care. RESULTS Seven hundred pediatric ED visits were included, with 200 prepolicy release and 500 postrelease. Computed tomography utilization decreased significantly postpolicy release from 43.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.6%-50.3%) to 22.2% (95% CI, 18.5%-25.8%). The proportion of ultrasounds with indeterminate results also decreased, with 71.5% (95% CI, 65.1%-77.9%) and 55.1% (95% CI, 50.7%-59.5%) in the pre and post groups, respectively. Physicians ordered fewer CTs after indeterminate ultrasounds, decreasing from 63.7% (95% CI, 56.9%-70.5%) to 48.3%% (95% CI, 43.9%-52.7%). CONCLUSIONS After the release of the clinical policy, CT utilization decreased significantly suggesting possible effectiveness of the policy in bringing about change in practice. Subsequently, there was an increase in the definitiveness in the ultrasound results. Physicians also evolved in their response to indeterminate ultrasound results, with fewer CTs ordered reflexively after indeterminate results.