Scripto | Revision Difference | Transcription
Correspondence from William Brooks Cabot to Fannie Hardy Eckstorm ca. 1930-1946, part 3
ms158_b1f017_003.12.pdf
Revision as of Aug 10, 2018, 3:28:56 PM created by Ronayne |
Revision as of Aug 10, 2018, 3:38:04 PM edited by Ronayne |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | �447 Marlboro St | |
+ | Dec [?]/30 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dear Mrs. Eckstorm, | ||
+ | |||
+ | I can't think of [?] [?] as anything, but our [?] peninsula word. Here it is [?] [?] mostly as in Shawmut. You get the ending as [?], present Potomac. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Re [?], I [?] have listed [?] [?] forms that are mostly not [?] true words. This is unkindness, for I can't clear them up yet. I've an idea the [?] is valid, the [?] standing for [?] long. And my troubles about the [?] type here lead toward [?] as a boundary term, v. [?], divisions, boundary, fence. The words for beyond also change into boundary terms, and I shouldn't wonder if your [?] [?] + [?] anmes both [?] the other side idea, whether used [?] a boundary [?] or not. | ||
+ | |||
+ | My first look at the [?] [?] + items on the map brought up [?], which [?] thought meanst doubled up, [?] [?] isn't. I don't think the [?] form applies. Then I fully accept the form + meaning Sylvia + Fannie [?]. They were |
Revision as of Aug 10, 2018, 3:38:04 PM
�447 Marlboro St Dec [?]/30
Dear Mrs. Eckstorm,
I can't think of [?] [?] as anything, but our [?] peninsula word. Here it is [?] [?] mostly as in Shawmut. You get the ending as [?], present Potomac.
Re [?], I [?] have listed [?] [?] forms that are mostly not [?] true words. This is unkindness, for I can't clear them up yet. I've an idea the [?] is valid, the [?] standing for [?] long. And my troubles about the [?] type here lead toward [?] as a boundary term, v. [?], divisions, boundary, fence. The words for beyond also change into boundary terms, and I shouldn't wonder if your [?] [?] + [?] anmes both [?] the other side idea, whether used [?] a boundary [?] or not.
My first look at the [?] [?] + items on the map brought up [?], which [?] thought meanst doubled up, [?] [?] isn't. I don't think the [?] form applies. Then I fully accept the form + meaning Sylvia + Fannie [?]. They were