Scripto | Revision Difference | Transcription

Correspondence from Charles E. Banks to Fannie Hardy Eckstorm ca. 1915-1930, Part 5

ms158_b1f005_005.03.pdf

Revision as of Sep 26, 2018, 10:11:48 PM
edited by Atibbitts
Revision as of Nov 30, 2018, 2:01:44 PM
edited by Cbellhoerth
Line 1: Line 1:
I have been puzzled to account for this paucity of aboriginal land markers.  There are no evidences of occupation, as shell leafs.  Probably for the lack of clam 'flats.' As far as I know, no burial mounds have been located.  Lever called it a deserted territory as far as Indians were concerned  in 1624 but referred to their planting fields (?).  Still they must have lived and died there.
+
I have been puzzled to account for this paucity of aboriginal land markers.  There are no evidences of occupation, as shell heaps.  Probably for the lack of clam "flats." As far as I know, no burial mounds have been located.  Lever called it a deserted territory as far as Indians were concerned  in 1624 but referred to their planting fields (?).  Still they must have lived and died there.
Finally, what do you say on [?]
+
Finally, what do you say on Wannametonnemy?
 
Yours Sincerely
 
Yours Sincerely
 
CE Banks
 
CE Banks

Revision as of Nov 30, 2018, 2:01:44 PM

I have been puzzled to account for this paucity of aboriginal land markers. There are no evidences of occupation, as shell heaps. Probably for the lack of clam "flats." As far as I know, no burial mounds have been located. Lever called it a deserted territory as far as Indians were concerned in 1624 but referred to their planting fields (?). Still they must have lived and died there. Finally, what do you say on Wannametonnemy? Yours Sincerely CE Banks