Scripto | Revision Difference | Transcription
Correspondence from William Brooks Cabot to Fannie Hardy Eckstorm ca. 1930-1946, part 2
ms158_b1f017_002.13.pdf
Revision as of Jul 9, 2018, 4:11:54 PM created by Ronayne |
Revision as of Jul 9, 2018, 4:22:14 PM edited by Ronayne |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | � | + | �[?] as a [?] label, + I did so. That was before I had a Virginia [?], but now I find (old Va.) nepensum, dust, in the vocabs I have looked up the punk form for sand is only for fine sand; it belongs really [?] find stuff that blows about easily, dust, powder, ashes; the [?] to mean little, small; a rather commons use in [?]. Because we have so many important [?} [?] hereabouts that are [?] I still learn that way, but am ready to dodge if you stir. |
+ | Re. Mohegan, Beauchamp says one of the forms of [?] is [?]. Now [?] in Connecticut. The full form is [?] which implies some sort of [?] or [?] + you [?] just that in |
Revision as of Jul 9, 2018, 4:22:14 PM
�[?] as a [?] label, + I did so. That was before I had a Virginia [?], but now I find (old Va.) nepensum, dust, in the vocabs I have looked up the punk form for sand is only for fine sand; it belongs really [?] find stuff that blows about easily, dust, powder, ashes; the [?] to mean little, small; a rather commons use in [?]. Because we have so many important [?} [?] hereabouts that are [?] I still learn that way, but am ready to dodge if you stir. Re. Mohegan, Beauchamp says one of the forms of [?] is [?]. Now [?] in Connecticut. The full form is [?] which implies some sort of [?] or [?] + you [?] just that in